Final award conclusive unless an appeal is taken
When the workers' compensation commission makes a final decision, that decision is final unless someone appeals it within 30 days. To appeal, a person files a notice with the commission, and the case goes to circuit court. The court can only look at legal questions — not hear new evidence — and can only change the decision for four reasons: the commission went beyond its authority, the award was obtained by fraud, the facts don't support the award, or there wasn't enough solid evidence. This section only covers injury claims that happened before August 13, 1980.
287.490. unless an is taken — grounds for setting aside — disputes governed by this section, arising before August 13, 1980. — 1. The final award of the shall be conclusive and unless either to the dispute shall within thirty days from the date of the final award appeal to the of the county in which the accident occurred, or if the accident occurred outside of this state, then in the county where the was made. Such appeal may be taken by with the commission, whereupon the commission shall under its to the court all documents and papers on file in the matter, together with a of the evidence, the findings and , which shall thereupon become the of the cause. Upon appeal no additional evidence shall be heard and in the absence of , the made by the commission within its powers shall be conclusive and binding. The court, on appeal, shall only questions of law and may , reverse, for , or the award upon any of the following grounds and no other:
(1) That the commission acted without or in excess of its powers;
(2) That the award was procured by fraud;
(3) That the facts found by the commission do not support the award;
(4) That there was not sufficient in the record to the making of the award.
2. Appeals from the circuit court shall be allowed in the same manner as in , except that the original transcript prepared and filed in the circuit court by the commission, together with a transcript of the proceedings had in the circuit court, shall constitute the transcript on appeal in the . The commission shall make available, to the parties, copies of any transcript prepared and filed by it in the circuit court and upon of the cause in the appellate court the original record of the commission filed as a part of the transcript on appeal shall be back to the commission by the appellate court. In all appeals from the commission or circuit court the costs thereof shall be assessed against the losing party as provided by law in . All appeals to the and shall have over all cases except .
3. The of this section shall only apply to disputes based on claims which arose prior to August 13, 1980. All disputes based on claims arising on or after August 13, 1980, shall be governed by the provisions of section 287.495.
(RSMo 1939 § 3732, A.L. 1955 p. 598, A.L. 1980 H.B. 1396)
Prior revision: 1929 § 3342
(1960) Where commission award of that had not accidental injury and claimant appealed to circuit court and procured the he sought, namely remand of the with directions to dismiss for want of because of no accident, the employer and were thereby "" within meaning of § 512.020 but on the record the appellate court would not review question of whether an accident existed. Harger v. Acme Fast Freight Inc. (Mo.), 336 S.W.2d 109.
(1963) was not required to set out specific findings of facts as to each individual injury and the resultant percent of attributed to each, and ultimate findings of commission that claimant sustained 40% to body as a whole was sufficient and award was properly based thereon. Carenza v. Vulcan-Cincinnati, Inc. (A.), 368 S.W.2d 507.
(1963) Workmen's commission had implied to enter vacating award prior to expiration of thirty-day appeal period. Fisher v. City of Independence (Mo.), 370 S.W.2d 310.
(1963) Commission's finding that janitor's activity amounted to "an unusual or abnormal strain" which constituted an accident because he exerted himself beyond his usual routine in clearing snow from extensive area of employer's sidewalk was a legal conclusion and, therefore, award was subject to review. Flippin v. First of Joplin (A.), 372 S.W.2d 273.
(1965) held sufficient to order denying compensation. Dixon v. Art Bunker Motors, Inc. (A.), 387 S.W.2d 199.
(1965) In workmen's compensation case the reviewing court cannot substitute its own judgment on the evidence for that of the industrial commission, but is empowered to determine whether the award of the commission is supported by on the whole record. Jacobs v. Eldridge Construction Co. (A.), 393 S.W.2d 33.
(1967) Decisions of the industrial commission which are clearly the interpretation or of law, rather than a of facts, are not binding upon appeals court. Saxton v. St. Louis Stair Company (A.), 410 S.W.2d 369.
(1967) Where there is no conflict in, or dispute concerning, the facts bearing upon a claimant's status as an employee vel non, the of that becomes a question of law and the industrial commission's determination is not binding on the reviewing court. Lawson v. Lawson (A.), 415 S.W.2d 313.
(1969) Decisions of the industrial commission which are clearly the interpretations or applications of the law, as distinguished from a determination of facts, are not binding upon the court and are within the province of review and correction. Weilert v. Fruin-Colnon Corp. (A.), 447 S.W.2d 781.
(1970) Notice of Appeal to Industrial Commission of a Workman's Compensation Award must be received within 30 days. Holmes v. Navajo Freight Lines, Inc. (A.), 488 S.W.2d 311.
(1971) The findings of a referee are not binding on the commission but a reviewing court must an award by the commission if it is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record thus though the evidence was conflicting and some of claimant's was contradictory, but not to sufficient degree to destroy essential elements of his case, the court affirmed the award. Deatherage v. Churchill Truck Lines, Inc. (A.), 469 S.W.2d 660.
(1975) "Last known address" is that place where mail would be most likely to reach a person, that would be their residence. Failure of commission to send notice of award to residence prevented loss of jurisdiction because of 30 day in section 287.490. Cagle v. Regal Plastics Company (A.), 522 S.W.2d 7.
(1980) A circuit court in reviewing the decision of the commission cannot simply agree with a dissenting member of the commission that the evidence was not believable. Johnson v. General Motors Assembly G.M.C. (A.), 605 S.W.2d 511.
Tap any gold-underlined word to see what it means.
Red section numbers link to that law.
Legal information, not legal advice. Always confirm with the official source at revisor.mo.gov.