A farm that offers agritourism activities is not responsible if someone gets hurt from the normal risks of those activities, as long as the required warning sign is posted. But the farm can still be held responsible if it acts recklessly, knows about a dangerous condition and hides it, or is not careful enough. The farm also has a defense if the hurt person knew the risks, ignored posted safety warnings, or misused equipment.
537.859. , when — . — 1. Except as provided in 2 of this section, a is not for injury to or death of a resulting from the of so long as the warning contained in section 537.856 is posted as required and, except as provided in subsection 2 of this section, no participant or participant's shall maintain an against or recover from a registered agritourism operator for injury, loss, damage, or death of the participant resulting exclusively from any of the inherent risks of agritourism activities.
2. Nothing in sections 537.850 to 537.859 shall prevent or limit the of a registered agritourism operator if the registered agritourism operator:
(1) Injures the participant by ;
(2) Has or should have known of a dangerous condition in the facilities or equipment used in the and does not make such dangerous condition known to a participant and such dangerous condition causes the participant to injuries; or
(3) Fails to use that degree of care that an ordinarily careful and person would use under the same or similar circumstances.
3. In any action for for personal injury, death, or property damage arising from the operation of a registered tourism activity in which an owner or is named as a , it shall be an affirmative defense to that liability that:
(1) The injured person ;
(2) The injured person deliberately disregarded signs, verbal instructions, or other warnings regarding safety measures during the activity; or
(3) Any equipment, animals, or appliance used by the injured person during the activity was* used in a manner or for a purpose other than that for which a reasonable person should have known they were intended.
Tap any gold-underlined word to see what it means.
Red section numbers link to that law.
Source & history notes
(L. 2012 S.B. 631) *Word "were" appears in original rolls of S.B. 631, 2012.
Related Missouri laws
Signage required
RSMo 537.856
Citation of law
RSMo 537.850
Criminal or harmful acts, no duty of business to guard against, when
RSMo 537.787
Citation of law
RSMo 537.785
Contributory fault as complete bar to plaintiff's recovery abolished
RSMo 537.765
State of the art, defined
RSMo 537.764
Legal information, not legal advice. Always confirm with the official source at revisor.mo.gov.